
Good morning. In 1975, stock trades cost $100+ per transaction. Today? Zero. The transformation happened because Charles Schwab recognized that technology could eliminate unnecessary middlemen and drastically reduce costs for consumers.
Real estate is following the exact same trajectory. The only question is: how long will brokerages continue to convince you to keep paying inflated commissions before you demand the same disruption that transformed investing?
The Wall Street Transformation Nobody in Real Estate Wants You to Remember
Before 1975, the SEC mandated fixed commission rates for stock trades. Sound familiar? Brokers charged identical fees regardless of actual work performed—just like real estate agents claiming 6% is "standard" today.
Charles Schwab launched his discount brokerage in 1974, betting investors would embrace lower-cost trading once they had a choice. The industry fought back viciously, claiming discount brokers would destroy market integrity and harm consumers.
Here's what actually happened: Commission costs dropped from $100+ to zero. Trading volume exploded. Traditional brokerages that refused to adapt either went bankrupt or disappeared. Consumers saved billions while gaining unprecedented control over their investments.
The real estate industry dismisses lower-cost alternatives as "discount brokers"—but that framing is deliberately misleading. When traditional brokerages charge 6% for commoditized services, they're not offering "full service"—they're operating as inflated commission brokers. The real question is: why are you paying the markup?
The parallels to real estate are impossible to ignore—except the real estate industry is fighting to prevent the exact transformation that made investing accessible to millions.
Why Real Estate Brokerages Fear This Model
Traditional real estate brokerages understand what happened to stock brokers who refused to adapt. That's why they're fighting so hard to preserve their commission-heavy model.
Technology has eliminated the information advantage agents once held. You can search properties, view comparables, schedule tours, and research neighborhoods without ever contacting an agent—just like investors today research stocks and execute trades without traditional brokers.
Consider this: 71% of licensed agents didn't complete a single transaction in 2024. The barrier to entry is so low that real estate licensing requires less training than becoming a hairstylist—creating the same low-competency environment as old boiler room stock brokers who treated it as a pure numbers game rather than a skilled profession.
The services that justify 6% commissions have already been commoditized—they just haven't told you yet.
The "Value-Added Services" Excuse
After commission cuts threatened their business model, traditional stock brokers pivoted to claiming their "value-added services" justified premium fees. They offered research reports and advisory services that discount brokers supposedly couldn't match.
Here's what they won't tell you: Many core tasks in selling real estate require zero specialized skill. Hiring photographers, scheduling cleaners, coordinating showings—these are administrative tasks anyone can handle. Yet brokerages bundle them with true advisory work to justify inflated percentage-based fees.
Real estate agents today make identical claims about their "expertise," "market knowledge," and "negotiation skills" justifying 6% commissions—despite technology making most of these services either unnecessary or available at drastically lower costs.
The reality: Discount brokers didn't eliminate advisory services—they separated them from transaction fees. Want professional investment advice? Pay for an advisor. Want to execute trades yourself? The cost is zero.
Real estate should work the same way: Need professional guidance? Pay for advisory services at fair hourly rates. Want to handle straightforward aspects yourself? Don't pay inflated commissions for services you don't need.
Traditional brokerages never say "You don't need staging, so we'll reduce our commission by $3,000." Instead, when you need fewer services, they simply profit more for doing less work—pocketing the difference rather than passing savings to you.
What Real Estate Disruption Actually Looks Like
Just as Vanguard revolutionized investing by eliminating unnecessary fees and putting investor interests first through structural innovation, PropertyPage.io and Local Real Estate Advisors represent the same consumer-first transformation for real estate—not just discounting existing models, but fundamentally redesigning how transactions work.
Transparent pricing based on actual work performed: Just as discount brokers moved from percentage-based fees to per-trade pricing and eventually zero, real estate compensation should reflect services used and time invested—not arbitrary percentage-based fees.
Consumer control over transaction data: Schwab gave investors direct access to information and execution capabilities. PropertyPage.io does the same for real estate—sellers control their property data and share documents directly with buyers, while buyers can review full transparency and make simplified offers without agent gatekeepers. No MLS monopolies selling your data to lead aggregators who inflate your costs.
Optional advisory services at fair rates: Schwab and Vanguard separated professional advice from transaction fees, proving you could get expert guidance without mandatory bundled costs. Real estate should work the same way—straightforward hourly advisory for guidance when needed, not inflated percentage-based commissions you're forced to accept regardless of complexity.
Technology that simplifies rather than complicates: Schwab and Vanguard proved technology could reduce costs while improving user experience. PropertyPage.io follows the same principle—making transparent transactions simple instead of perpetuating artificial complexity.
The Inevitable Disruption Timeline
The stock brokerage transformation took approximately 20 years from Schwab's launch to widespread commission-free trading. Real estate is following a similar path—we're just earlier in the cycle.
Where we are now: The 2024 NAR settlement is real estate's "1975 fixed commission ban"—the regulatory crack that allows disruption to accelerate. Traditional brokerages are fighting to preserve inflated rates while dismissing alternatives as "discount" services and devising new schemes to disguise the same inflated commission structures under different labels.
What's coming next: Consumer awareness will reach a tipping point. Just as investors eventually questioned why they paid $100 for trades that cost brokers pennies to execute, buyers and sellers will demand answers about why they're paying $25,000+ in commissions for transactions technology has dramatically simplified.
The endgame: Real estate will split into two distinct models—high-touch advisory services for complex transactions, and streamlined technology-enabled transactions for straightforward deals. Total transaction costs will drop from 5-6% to 1.5-3% as unqualified and unnecessary middlemen get eliminated.
Traditional brokerages that refuse to adapt will follow the same path as full-service stock brokers who ignored the discount revolution—consolidation, bankruptcy, or irrelevance.
How to Position Yourself for the Disruption
The smartest move you can make is embracing the disruption now rather than waiting for brokerages to adapt years from now.
If you're buying: Stop accepting that 2.8-3% buyer agent commissions are inevitable. Negotiate rebates, work with advisors at hourly rates, or learn how to buy directly from transparent sellers.
If you're selling: Be a transparent seller—empower buyers to purchase directly from you while working with an advisor who facilitates honest transactions rather than inflating commissions. List on PropertyPage.io alongside traditional platforms to give buyers direct access without inflated commission structures.
For everyone: The "standard" 6% commission structure is already dead—it just doesn't know it yet. The more consumers refuse to pay inflated fees, the faster the industry adapts.
Charles Schwab won because investors recognized they were being overcharged for commoditized services. You've always sensed something wasn't right about real estate transaction costs. Now you have the insider knowledge and proven tools to demand the change everyone knows is overdue.
Want the proven strategies more consumers are using to simplify transactions and save thousands while traditional brokerages cling to outdated models? Email me at [email protected] or click here to schedule a free strategy call.
Also worth noting
Once a Restaurant, Then a Granary, This Jewel-Box Town House Defines Serenity in the City (Architectural Digest)
Coastal US city named the world’s most vulnerable real estate bubble by UBS (New York Post)
The 10 most affordable housing markets in the world—9 are in the U.S. (CNBC)
Next week
The private listing network trap: How brokerages like Compass market your property to their agents first—disguising it as exclusive access when it's actually designed to double-end deals, keeping the full commission in-house while limiting your market exposure and costing you tens of thousands.
About me
I'm Mathew Speer, founder of Real Estate Insider News and PropertyPage.io—the first consumer-centered real estate listing platform. I've invested in real estate for two decades, worked as an agent for 14 years including time at large brokerage firms, and owned and operated my own independent real estate brokerage, Local Real Estate Advisors, for eight years.
After witnessing an industry that profits from keeping consumers in the dark, I authored "The Consumer's Guide to Buying and Selling Real Estate" and built PropertyPage.io to provide the transparency and control missing from traditional real estate transactions.
I write this newsletter to arm you with the knowledge that saves thousands while simplifying the process—exposing the tactics, revealing the truth, and giving you the power to transact on your own terms in a system designed to work against you.